Eyeskreen takes a close look at Michel Van der Aa’s Video Opera Up Close, performed at Floriana as part of the Malta Arts Festival.
In a time where the strength of an electronic medium depends entirely on its potential to converge with other media, cinema seems to struggle, and it is this limitation which Michel van der Aa’s video opera Up Close, featuring soloist Konstanze van Gutzeit, indirectly addresses.
It has been debated over and over again by numerous directors how the structure of cinema is at a standstill, failing to reinvent itself with time, unlike say, television, which has smoothly integrated and reshaped its structure with the advent of the internet.
Film after film, we wait for something new to happen, something dynamic beyond 3D or digital projection that will once again shackle and revive the concept of cinema. I had partially experienced that feeling with the recent screening of the film Under the Skin by Jonathan Glazer at St James Cavalier.
But it wasn’t until I witnessed Up Close that I understood that cinema really has the possibility to reinvent itself with time, if only producers think hard outside the box.
Up Close was presented last Saturday at the Grand Hotel Excelsior in Floriana, as part of the Malta Arts Festival programme. The interdisciplinary performance Up Close features soloist Konstanze van Gutzeit under the direction of Pavel Snajdr and supported by the string orchestra of the Malta philharmonic orchestra. It merges cinema and contemporary classical music in a manner which I probably won’t witness again locally for quite some time.
Before I go on, let’s make it clear that sound and film are of course no strangers to each other. The struggle to couple the two together dates back to the dawn of cinema itself in 1895, which is way before sound was formally introduced in film through Al Jonson’s The Jazz Singer in 1927. From that point onwards though, the visual medium of film could no longer be thought of independently from sound even though ironically, sound in film generally took the backseat in terms of importance.
The traditional performance between soloist and ensemble in Up Close is extended to include the medium of film. From then on, we ask ourselves if the film images are supporting the music or vice versa. The inability to answer this question is what really makes the mysterious Up Close shine.
The mysterious older woman’s actions seen on the screen seem to run parallel to the action happening on stage, and also seem to represent the older version of the wonderful soloist. Throughout the video opera, the screen and the stage interact in what felt to me like a struggle between the different media. What is important and completely exclusive to this haunting, yet abstract work by Michel van der Aa, is how meaning may be derived through the interconnection rather than the simple automatic interdependence between sight and sound.
A fascinating aspect from Up close was how both the visuals on screen and the live music seemed to be conscious of one another, constantly struggling to remain in the limelight. Other elements introduced later in the video opera were the use of an electronic soundtrack, as well as a performance by soloist Konstanze van Gutzeit.
Despite the abstract nature of the music, all these separate elements seemed to work in unison, while maintaining their strength as separate artistic methods. This is truly a remarkable contemporary act.
You may leave perplexed if you ever manage to witness Up Close, or any other inerdisciplinary work by Michel van der Aa (he is known as a composer who includes other media in his work). It is highly unlikely though, that you will ever forget such an experience.